ProofThe training report
A dated, reproducible report, checked by a person, stating whether an AI learned a signed work and through which copy. Built to support legal action.
Every copy of a film or a piece of music receives its own invisible signature on delivery. If an artificial intelligence learns the work, it learns that signature too, and we know how to read it.
Rights holders have opted out of AI training. Without a technical means, there is no way to show that the opt-out was ignored.
When a catalogue is licensed to an AI company, nothing lets you check how it is really used, whether the scope is respected, or whether the works are removed when the deal ends.
A film goes out in dozens of copies. When one of them resurfaces, online or inside an AI, nobody knows which channel it came from.
An imperceptible signature, unique to the recipient, is embedded in the master. Picture and sound stay untouched.
Each copy is logged in a dated, sealed register, along with the author's choice regarding AI.
We analyse the suspect model and hand over a dated report: did the AI learn the work, and from which copy?
A dated, reproducible report, checked by a person, stating whether an AI learned a signed work and through which copy. Built to support legal action.
For collecting societies: how licensed works are really used, whether the agreed scope is respected, whether works are removed when the deal ends, and a basis for sharing revenue between authors.
All your signed copies and their recipients, plus ongoing monitoring of published AI models.
Check, before training a model, whether a piece of content is signed and what its author has chosen.
For broadcasters: a signature designed to follow a real-time stream, channel by channel.
The same approach for music: an inaudible signature, unique to each copy, that we can read inside a music AI.
A demo, a trial on a few copies, a legal or technical question: drop us a line.
Contact us